The problem with football

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

You know there’s something wrong with football when Roberto Mancini can take the moral high ground without the rest of the world keeling over in fits of laughter.

But that’s how crazy things are over at Manchester City. A manager who spends a few hundred million pounds on players and still complains about not having enough midfielders – while the rest of the world stares at a financial crisis – is a veritable saint compared to the wretch that is Carlos Tevez.

“In the middle I didn’t have any players because we have James Milner and Nigel de Jong out injured,” Mancini said a couple of weeks ago, conveniently ignoring the fact that Yaya Toure, David Silva, Samir Nasri, Gareth Barry and Owen Hargreaves could form their own boyband of midfielders.

Toure could be the tall, buff one who only pretends to sing while performing some overdramatic dance moves, and Silva could be the shorter, more boyish looking one who constantly stares longingly into the camera while clutching his heart. Nasri, of course, would be the token bad boy.

But I digress. I’m just way too excited about Westlife coming to Malaysia. Oh, the memories…

Incidentally, did you know that Westlife’s Nicky Byrne (the shorter, more boyish looking one who constantly stares longingly into the camera while clutching his heart) was a former professional goalkeeper, and was in Leeds United’s 1997 FA Youth Cup winning squad? 

I digress again. The point I was about to make about Carlos Tevez was that it takes someone quite absurdly rotten to make Mancini and his City slickers look good. And this is a team that has pathological idiot Mario Balotelli in it. 

Yet Tevez has managed to achieve that with two simple words – “¿por qué?”, everybody’s favourite telenovela phrase (translation – “why”). Fitting, considering the soap opera standards of City’s season so far. 

According to newspapers who bothered enough to get lip readers, that’s what Tevez said when he “allegedly” refused to come on as a substitute against Bayern Munich during their Champions League tie. 

That was enough for Mancini to get all high and mighty at the post-match press conference, proudly declaring that Tevez would never play for City again, inadvertently making himself the leader of the lynch mob that has been calling for Tevez’s head ever since. You know, for the good of the game. 

That mob included managers like Mick McCarthy, whose sagely wisdom we all so crave for. 

He weighed in on the debate with his usual arrogance – you know, since he’s the boss of the mighty Wolverhamptom Wanderers – saying if he were Tevez’s manager, he would’ve left the player on the tarmac in Munich because he’s “bad for the game globally”. 

Sadly, a manager like him will never get to a position to manage a world class player like Tevez. 

But wretched and rotten as he is, if you asked me, I think Tevez is hardly the problem with the football. 

Yes, Tevez has been trouble from the minute he stepped off that plane in London. He was trouble for West Ham United (£5.5million worth of trouble thanks to that record fine for his illegal transfer to the club), he was trouble for Manchester United (refusing to stay at the club beyond his two-year loan spell because Alex Ferguson had “disrespected” him) and now he’s trouble for Manchester City. 

He hasn’t bothered to learn English (who knew who he couldn’t even say “why”?), he has complained endlessly about life in England, and he continues to act like a petulant child while receiving the kind of money in a month that I probably wouldn’t do in my lifetime. 

So, why would I defend him, especially considering how much I have loathed him ever since he left United? 

Take a look at the headlines from this weekend’s Premier League action. Arsenal fans, supposedly well-educated Londoners, were taunting Togolese striker Emmanuel Adebayor with mass chants about the gun attack on the Togo national football team bus last year, which left three people dead. “It should have been you” was the clever line they came up with. 

A week before that, Manchester United fans at the Carling Cup tie against bitter rivals Leeds United unfurled a banner with an utterly humourless reference to two Leeds fans who were stabbed to death in Istanbul. 

Leeds fans responded by chanting about Munich and the plane crash in 1958 that killed eight of United’s fabled Busby Babes team. 

Other major headlines have included Arsene Wenger’s refusal to shake the hand of Spurs coach Clive Allen, and QPR star Adel Tarrabt storming out of the stadium after being substituted at half-time, only to be caught posing for pictures with fans near a pub. 

And that’s just this weekend. 

Ask yourselves – who is the poster boy for the England national football team? Wayne Rooney, the man who slept with sex workers while his wife was pregnant, and who used the loyalty of a club that has turned him into a global superstar as a bargaining tool to negotiate an even ludicrously higher contract. 

Owen Hargreaves, having earned a healthy salary from Manchester United for four years where he played less than 30 games, had the cheek to turn around and accuse the club of ruining his knees and hampering his recovery. Sorry Hargo, but you really were made of glass. 

Half the England squad have been linked with vice girls at some point, and we might be finding out even more after Rio Ferdinand’s privacy case against the Sunday Mirror was dismissed, a possible landmark case in favour of the English tabloids. 

It seems players and fans alike in English football have taken that sense of self-entitlement a little too far, thanks to this grotesque culture of excess often masked as passion that has been slowly growing beneath the polished exterior of the Premier League. 

Tevez might be the latest personification of that. but he wasn’t the one that broke the rules to bring himself to the Premier League. West Ham did. 

The money he earns might have bloated his ego, but City were the ones who were more than willing to pay him. They even made him club captain. 

Mancini’s own son, Filippo, was revealed to have recently refused to come on as a substitute in a match for City’s youth team, just like Tevez in Munich. 

He’s not a contracted player like Tevez, who earns £1,000,000 a month, but that’s not the point. He’s a young boy who has been given the chance to live the dream as a well-paid professional footballer (even if it’s with City), but apparently that wasn’t good enough for him. 

So Roberto Mancini can go all saintly on Tevez now, but in truth, he’s just as much a part of the bigger problem that now taints English football.

Great weekend for Man United

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

If there ever was a definite sign that a team will not qualify for the Champions League, it would have to be a humiliating defeat by Blackburn Rovers under Steve Kean.

The naive little puppy of a manager somehow got his Rovers to put in a performance that much less inept than Arsenal’s, and that was good enough for Kean to exit the dugout beaming from ear to ear and waving joyously to fans who were probably giving him the finger.

While his ecstasy was completely misplaced, Arsene Wenger’s despair was not.

Even Wenger’s infamous selective vision couldn’t disguise his team’s failings, and Wenger, who almost never publicly criticises his players, was forced to face the fact that his team did not defend well enough.

Now Arsenal face the same problem Liverpool had with Rafa Benitez. There was no denying that Benitez was the best guy for the job, but he just couldn’t stop the rot at Liverpool. The crisis of confidence had hit critical mass, and the club just couldn’t afford to let it go any further.

Wenger is a living legend, one of the best managers the English game has ever seen. If in some parallel universe where Wenger wasn’t Arsenal manager, and the club was facing the exact same crisis, Wenger would have been the perfect man to lead them out of it.

But in this universe, one where Wenger is already presiding over the crisis, there is a tough call to make.

He has asked for time to allow his new signings to settle in, which is only fair; but unfortunately, the fragile confidence of the squad at the moment might not be able to take any more punishment.

It would be a real shame to see Arsene Wenger leave Arsenal. But he had a hand in getting himself in this mess by letting the Fabregas/Nasri sagas drag on as long as they did, and now he’ll have to pick up the pieces. Quick.

Terrific Tottenham, or lousy Liverpool?

Sorry, I didn’t watch the game, but I hear Tottenham were pretty good.

Alex Ferguson had sent Kenny Dalglish an ominous warning at the end of last season, saying Liverpool would find getting back to the top of the Premier League ain’t that easy.

And these were probably the kind of games Ferguson had in mind when he said that.

Sometimes, it doesn’t matter if you sign a whole bunch of super talented players. You have to survive this league and everything it throws at you.

You have to thrive under the constant pressure, rebound from even the most crushing defeats, and have the willpower to go all the way to the end.

Liverpool had invested brilliantly in the transfer market, and I even tipped them to finish in the top three ahead of Chelsea based on their signings this year, but only time will tell if they can develop those nerves of steel fast enough to keep them in it throughout the rest of the campaign.

As for Tottenham, would you bet against them finishing above Arsenal, given that their strongest XI would include players like Gareth Bale, Luka Modric, Emmanuel Adebayor, Rafael van der Vaart and Aaron Lennon?

I noticed Ledley King was also playing against Liverpool, and he can seriously mix it up with the best of the best when he’s fit.

Players like Sandro and Tom Huddlestone have bags of potential, and when Jermaine Defoe gets over his slump (if he ever does), he could add his usual streak of goals to prop them up the table.

So I’d say Tottenham are looking quite terrific now, while Liverpool still have the propensity to be lousy ocassionally.

City slip-up

I thought it would never happen. Turns out all it took was a Champions League hangover and a typically combative mid-table Premier League team to do the trick. And luck. A whole lot of luck.

But fortune favours the bold. After Fulham scored on 55mins and started to look mildly threatening, Roberto Mancini withdrew creator-in-chief David Silva for defender Pablo Zabaleta. He might have been an attacker of considerable class and imagination as a player, but as a manager, Mancini is boring as hell.

This is Fulham we’re talking about. A top club doesn’t switch to being all defensive tactically just because Fulham has scored a goal against you and are starting to look menacing. You compose yourself, maintain your belief in your ability, and slowly impose yourself on the game again.

And if it doesn’t work out and you end up conceding another two goals, at least you can say you gave it a right go. Odds are however, if you are the better team, and you play with the conviction of one, you would be the one scoring first.

But being Italian, Mancini’s instinct made him take the other option – to sit back and defend.

Ferguson made no such changes against Chelsea. Anderson replaced by Michael Carrick after an off-colour performance, but the players’ brief was still the same – score more goals.

Of course, tactical changes are forced on you sometimes, due to players who’re having an off-day or opponents who are simply playing better in certain areas. You have to respond to that.

But with Mancini, it’s always a reaction, a negative move that stems from his fear of losing, rather than a positive attitude of blazing forward for the win; and honestly, long may it continue.

United lucky? Not a chance.

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

The only thing more frustrating than Manchester United’s performance against Benfica last night was the bloody commentating.

United were lucky to have drawn level? They were dominated by Benfica now, were they? Gimme a break.

United were off-colour, but they deserved their point.

The two commentators just wouldn’t let it go. Yes United were below the lofty standards they’ve set for themselves this season, but they deserved their point just as much as Benfica.

United were sluggish, careless in possession and lacking in ideas – but Benfica struggled to impose themselves on the game too. United still had over 60% of possession throughout almost the entire game, and they carved out as many presentable opportunities as Benfica.

The draw was a fair result. United were poor – understandable considering Alex Ferguson was giving several players their first competitive starts of the season AND they were playing away from home in the Champions League – but they weren’t THAT poor. Those commentators were just being such drama queens.

On a more positive note…

Ryan Giggs‘ brilliant goal against Benfica has made him the only player to have scored in 16 seasons of Champions League football.

Driving in from the right wing after a neat exchange, he fired an unstoppable shot in from outside the area.

A goal worthy of winning most games, but for the commentators, it wasn’t even good enough for a draw (sorry, I still can’t let that go…).

Back to the negative…

Guess which United player was at fault for Benfica’s opener? You guessed it – Jonny Evans.

It was a decent turn and finish from Oscar Cordozo after receiving a lobbed pass from midfield, but c’mon, Jonny – you’re a defender at one of the biggest clubs in the world. You really shouldn’t be getting skinned that easily. It looked like he didn’t have a chance in hell in that situation, and that shouldn’t be the case.

And Cordozo isn’t some sneaky, lightning quick forward. He’s a lumbering 6 ft 4 in target man that weighs 14 stone.

In fact, if you watch the replays, Evans shouldn’t have allowed Cordozo to bring the ball down so easily in the first place. He should have been on to him quicker, heading the ball away or clattering him to the ground. That’s all he’s good for anyway, right?

Sorry Jonny, you just don’t have what it takes. You’re a liability to the team, your chronic lack of pace won’t be getting any better, and it’s time for you to go.

More negativity…

Michael Carrick. What an awful player he’s become. Barely there in defense, completely without contribution in attack and utterly redundant in midfield.

He wasn’t interested in making an impact on the game at all. He was just there to play it safe, to move the ball sideways or backwards whenever possession came his way; and I mean it when I say possession CAME HIS WAY, because he couldn’t be bothered trying to win it or asking for it.

If there’s one thing I can’t stand in a United player, it’s a lack of ambition and endeavour. Time to sell him to Sunderland, if they’ll have him. At least Wes Brown and John O’Shea gave their all for the shirt.

What happened to the Villans?

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Under Martin O’Neill, I always saw Aston Villa as one of the good guys.

They were really good for the Premier League, one of the very few clubs that weren’t just challenging the Big Four (as it were back then), but doing so by playing attacking football, and without spending ridiculous fortunes.

Three consecutive sixth-place finishes in the Premier League are a testament to the good work O’Neill did, but even more importantly is the way he accomplished it, buying and putting his faith in young English players, encouraging them to play with a sense of adventure that few in the league had dared to at the time.

But thanks to yet more odd decision making from football club owners, O’Neill was allowed to leave the club.

Rumours has it that he resigned after being told he’d have to sell club jewels like James Milner before he could buy anyone else – even though it was O’Neill who had cleverly poached him from Newcastle United in a deal that ended up costing only around 4 million pounds.

With all that good work of developing players like Milner, Ashley Young, Gareth Barry and Gabriel Agbonlahor into world class players, he was told he’d have to let them go if he wanted to improve the squad further. It still doesn’t make sense.

It gets worse when you think that Villa decided to spend a record 24 million pounds on Darren Bent AFTER firing O’Neill.

And now, a whole bunch of players who had matured under O’Neill are reaching the peak of their careers with rival clubs – Barry and Milner at Manchester City, Young at Manchester United, Stewart Downing at Liverpool. Incidentally, they’re all England regulars now too, as was Emile Heskey, whose England renaissance came while he was playing for O’Neill.

It also seems only a matter of time that Gabriel Agbonlahor will join the list of ex-Villa players. The striker was below par last season under Gerard Houllier’s management (the rest of the team didn’t do very well either), but class is permanent – he will eventually earn a move to a bigger side, or at least a side going somewhere.

Villa used to be one of those bigger sides, and they’ve even gone backwards now by hiring Alex McLeish, who won’t be guiding Villa to consistent sixth-placed finishes any time soon. He was, after all, very much responsible for his previous club Birmingham City’s relegation.

Credit where it’s due

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Fabio Capello has been praised for giving youth a chance, while Roberto Mancini got a pat on the back for taking a gamble on a free agent. If I had not known any better, I would have thought that I had woken up to the footballing equivalent of 28 Days Later.

Just imagine, a desolated world where boring, defensive football is praised and managers force attackers to play like zombies, all while Sepp Blatter sits on a throne as the Evil Overlord of the entire universe. And there’s still no goal-line technology. Oh the horror.

Unfortunately, it wasn’t a nightmare, and it wasn’t a joke either. The headlines I was staring at on my computer screen commending Capello and Mancini, puryevors of stodgy football and an egotistical management style fuelled by the countless millions in their coffers, were real.

After calling up youngsters Phil Jones, Chris Smalling, Tom Cleverley and Danny Welbeck to the England squad for the 3-0 victory over Bulgaria, Capello was treated to a round of praise in the British press for “taking a gamble on youth”.

Capello fielded ONE new youngster in the team against Bulgaria and the press praises him for "taking a gamble on youth".

Honestly, even if Capello had handed Elton John a call-up, the average age of the England squad could not have gotten any higher than it was at the World Cup. Anyone would have been considered “youth” compared to that bunch of dinosaurs.

But more importantly, people need to realise that Capello doesn’t deserve any praise because all he did was basically leech off Alex Ferguson’s youth policy at Old Trafford. Not to mention, on closer scrutiny, the only youngster that made it to the starting XI was Chris Smalling (Theo Walcott’s the same age as Smalling, but he’s been there forever so he doesn’t count).

He has done absolutely nothing to encourage youth development in his three years with the England set-up, apart from giving Jack Wilshere a few games after South Africa – a safe gamble since his old charges had done so badly and he really had nothing to lose. Plus you’d really have to be an idiot to ignore Wilshere’s talent.

But then again, he’s also the guy that overlooked youngbloods like Theo Walcott, Gabriel Agbonlahor, Andy Carroll and Darren Bent for Emile “The Ole Donkey” Heskey. ‘Nuff said.

The truth is, Capello didn’t take any “gamble” on youth. He’s just lucky that at one of the lowest points in the history of the English national team, Ferguson has managed to develop another group of talented young Englishmen at Manchester United for him to choose from.

Capello could have either continued with that failing, ageing group he brought to South Africa, or go with the new kids Ferguson has brought up. That’s quite a no-brainer if you asked me.

The emergence of young stars like Tom Cleverley at Old Trafford has allowed Capello to inject some much-needed youth into the England national team.

In fact, the gamble was Ferguson’s, not Capello’s. While United’s rivals have mostly signed expensive foreign players (in Arsenal’s case, just foreign), Ferguson has placed his faith in this new crop of English youngsters, preparing them for battle at the very highest levels to the benefit of United, England and, more crucially, Capello.

The praise Capello received was just as ridiculous as the plaudits Mancini got, for taking a gamble on free agent Owen Hargreaves and not splurging the cash like only he knows how. It’s really hard to define what constitutes a gamble for Manchester City though, because if you asked me, any player signed at below £20mil (RM100mil) is really playing it safe for them.

Money aside, some are making Mancini out to be a saint who’s giving the erstwhile perpetually injured Hargreaves a second chance. Let’s face it, though, he only signed Hargreaves because he was a cheap, convenient cover for Yaya Toure, who would be gone for a month in January for the African Nations Cup. Also, it’s because that the club’s previous approaches for Daniele de Rossi, Fernando Gago and Mark van Bommel had failed.

They were obviously just looking for a stop-gap measure, and after realising that no big name player like de Rossi or Gago or even an older head like van Bommel would be interested in signing up for that kind of role, they turned to Hargreaves.

At least they would have known from YouTube that he was desperate to join any club (look up his “fitness videos” online. Quite hilarious).

Plus, they’re only giving Hargreaves a one-year deal where he will be paid a nominal salary and renumerated more on actual appearances on the field, so this deal could cost them close to nothing. How is that a gamble? It’s not called a gamble if you’ve got nothing to lose.

Mancini already had Gago, de Rossi and van Bommel turn him down, so Hargreaves it was.

Even if it all works out for Hargreaves and he manages to displace Toure, Nigel de Jong, Samir Nasri, David Silva, Gareth Barry and James Milner in the City midfield on a regular basis, again, Ferguson and Manchester United deserve some credit.

After providing him four years of constant medical treatment and expensive surgeries for knees that were just about as fragile as Lindsay Lohan’s sanity, Hargreaves finally overcame his injury problems.

And what does he do? He goes straight to Manchester City. Brilliant.

Ferguson had continued to put his faith in Hargreaves, surprising everyone by handing him a start once he got fit against Wolves last season, when most people were telling him to just give it up.

The club had also spent £17mil to sign him from Bayern Munich, plus millions more in wages and medical expenses, though he only ever made 27 league appearances for the club. So when Hargreaves offered to play for United for free at the end of his contract, they were well within their rights to take him up on it.

Neville: "That could be you playing down there some day..."

The club, however, advised him that it wouldn’t be in his best interests to stick around with all the youngsters coming through, which Hargreaves has admitted to be rather true.

They simply wouldn’t have been able to give him enough games for it to be constructive to his career. Do City and Mancini care as much about rehabilitating his career? I don’t think so.

Even if the Hargreaves experiment does somehow work out at City, and United’s Young Lions help England win the World Cup 2014 in Brazil, would Ferguson get any plaudits from the blue half of Manchester or the England supporters? Now that would be the footballing equivalent of What Dreams May Come.

Predictions for the season

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Balotelli's Maserati stinks as much as his attitude now, but City are still my favourites to challenge Man Utd for the trophy.

I really don’t want to write too much about Manchester City. I really don’t.

I was actually going to just do my predictions for the season, but right after my last entry on how City have been gleefully living up to their tag as the rich, noisy neighbours of English football, I read about that prank their players pulled on teammate Mario Balotelli.

Apparently, before leaving for the club’s pre-season tour in the United States, the players planted a bag of dead fish in “Mad” Mario’s £150,000 (RM735,000) Maserati sports car, which reportedly had to be written off because of the terrible, unremovable stench (this is the same car that infamously racked up £10,000/RM49,000 in parking fines).

Seriously, I don’t know how much more they can flaunt their money. That’s like me and my friends playing “My Germs” with a giant Cheesecake Factory cheesecake in front of a group of famished Rwandan orphans, and then having a food fight with it.

That's the kind of sports car stupid, rich footballers wreck as part of a prank - a 150,000 pound Maserati.

The fact that the story was “leaked” by a “source close to the club”, who told the story in quite astonishing detail – including the “revolting” sensation Balotelli had upon smelling his car, his plans for retribution, and the fact that the car was written off (er, did the source follow him to the insurers?) – screams of a desperate attempt by City to portray their dressing room as one where everybody’s chummy with each other.

Don’t be fooled. Balotelli has already thrown darts at youth team players from a balcony in one ill-fated attempt at dressing room games. After this fishy prank, he’ll be dusting off his crossbow and arrows. It won’t be pretty.

But if you asked me, the only thing standing in the way of City pushing Manchester United right to the end for the Premier League title, would be a dressing room implosion along those lines.

I think it’s more or less a given that to win the Premier League this season, you’ll only have to finish above United. They are the clear favourites, and no, that’s not my undying love for the club talking.

It’s going to be all about who pulls away from the chasing pack towards the end of the season, and whether they can rein in United. Unfortunately, Manchester City seem to be the favourites to do that, and could very well end up overtaking United too.

In Vincent Kompany, they have last season’s best central defender in the league. Nemanja Vidic got most of the plaudits, and for good reason, but for me, Kompany just edged it last season. He was, quite simply, sensational. He looked like a combination of Vidic and Rio Ferdinand at times.

In David Silva, City also have probably the best creative midfielder. The guy is pure, effortless class. The closest thing you can get to Xavi or Iniesta.

And in Carlos Tevez, they have the best striker in the league. Pair him with Sergio Aguero, and you have possibly the best strike partnership in the world.

More importantly, unlike the stuttering pack, they have started the season in fantastic form, with Aguero’s magical debut at Swansea followed by an away victory against tough cookies Bolton.

Part of that stuttering pack is Arsenal, who already look out of the title race.

Some might point to United’s 1995 “you’ll never win anything with kids” start to the season, where they lost 3-1 to Aston Villa but recovered to win the Double.

The difference is Alex Ferguson never lost hope in his young charges. Wenger just called his team “young” and “naive”.

Now I’m a huge fan of Wenger’s, but any manager who’s gone six years without a trophy while advocating football from Mars and stubbornly refusing to spend money surely can’t be calling his own players “naive”.

With the wheels coming off the wagon so early, I have a feeling Arsenal won’t even qualify for the Champions League next season.

Arsenal have lost two games, received two red cards, and are on the verge of losing two star players. No wonder he's scratching his head. And they play Manchester United next.

Taking their place in fourth spot, I believe, will be Chelsea. I know, I’m crazy, right?

I just feel that with Fernando Torres around, this Chelsea side will continue to frustrate as they have in their first two games. He seems to be playing for himself, to prove a point about his own ability. He’s been making dribbles when it would be easier to pass.

On the other hand, when the Chelsea vintage are all on the pitch – Lampard, Drogba, Terry, Anelka, even Kalou – they all play for each other. The one-touch passing becomes breath-taking, even if it only happens in spurts these days. Torres is just cramping their style.

But Roman Abramovich will, as usual, pressure the manager to play his new £50mil toy, and when it doesn’t work, he’ll fire him. It’s a ticking time-bomb, and Andre Villas-Boas has got to cut the right wire – take Torres out of the equation, show Abramovich that the Chelsea old guard can still win, and then only try to shoehorn Torres and the other youngsters in.

He shoots... and he misses! Torres has looked livelier in the first two games, but still seems to be playing for himself. AVB has a call to make to save Chelsea's season.

AVB’s been talking about bringing in a player who can play between the lines of midfield and attack like Luka Modric or Juan Mata as if it’d be the final piece of the puzzle, but I think one such player won’t make much of a difference. It’s all about the system.

So with the two bickering Manchester neighbours most likely finishing first and second, Chelsea in fourth and Arsenal completely out of the picture, my prediction for the club that will complete the top three is Liverpool.

They used to be a team that revolved around a few good players – Torres, Gerrard, Xabi Alonso – but now they are finally a formidable squad of players.

Kenny Dalglish has invested wisely in the summer, giving them a stronger squad than Chelsea, and with a much better mentality.

I think Villas-Boas’ dry, factual style with the media will be reflected in their style on the pitch, and ultimately their season – drab and uninspiring.

But Dalglish knows how to throw caution to the wind, to play with adventure, and that’s what a sleeping giant like Liverpool need – to forget about the past and play in the present.

So there you have it, my predictions for the season, for what it’s worth.

Some of them are highly unlikely, but since football predictions are a rubbish business anyway, I thought I might as well take a few long punts and hope I end up looking smart if it actually happens. All I want is for Manchester United to win anyway.

The inception of City

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

IT IS perhaps a testament to Alex Ferguson’s Sun Tzu-like mastery of the art of psychological warfare that Manchester City are still being referred to as the “noisy neighbours”.

The pundits were talking about it before last Sunday’s Community Shield, the football websites were referencing it after, and you can bet it’ll pop up again over the next week in pretty much every football talk show that touches on the match.

It makes me wonder why it was so darn hard for Leonardo DiCaprio. If Fergie was in Inception, the movie would’ve been over in 10 minutes. He’d hold a press conference and bingo. Idea planted. Case closed. No sequels. Simples.

Unfortunately for City, that idea seems to be festering, multiplying as quickly as Piers Morgan’s ego with every vain, self-absorbed yet fawning episode of Piers Morgan Tonight. As much as I was impressed with the Arsenal fans at the club’s open training session in Malaysia, singing all the players’ songs and showing genuine passion for the club, I couldn’t help but think – these people support the same club as Piers freakin’ Morgan? Unfortunate.

While Arsenal have built a reputation for themselves as the football purists’ choice thanks to Arsene Wenger’s unyielding faith in his philosophy, City’s reputation has been forged for them by Ferguson’s careful positioning – nay, inception – of two words in the minds’ of the public – Noisy Neighbours. It’s even an alliteration (two words that start with the same consonant)! Did Fergie think that through or what?

Now, every player that signs for Man City, every player that puts on the sky blue shirt – heck, even the tea lady at Eastlands – knows they would be pre-conceived and judged by everyone else as the noisy neighbours.

It eats away at the soul of the club, even one with the tradition and support base of Manchester City.

When Jose Mourinho arrived at Chelsea, he couldn’t be bothered planting any ideas about other clubs. It was all about planting ideas about himself, about creating that aura of invincibility surrounding the Special One, which coupled with unlimited financial resources and an already promising squad turned out to be quite the recipe for success.

Manchester City have the latter two ingredients, but again, thanks to Fergie, they are also saddled with a reputation as a club that makes plenty of noise over potential marquee signings, flaunts their new-found riches, and promises much but delivers little.

Incidentally, another common tag that Manchester City have now is that of the nouveau riche of the Premier League, a term used to describe the newly rich, mostly in a derogatory sense – those from a lower social standing who have recently come to money, and therefore tend to spend it gauchely.

Quite similarly, City can boast loudly, for instance, over the ridiculous amounts of money they spend on players like Sergio Aguero, but in terms of their true status in football, they will remain pariahs in the eyes of the neutrals, at least in the foreseeable future.

Players like Mario Balotelli will still see City as just a stepping stone – and retirement plan, perhaps – towards playing for his dream team AC Milan.

And for all the money in the world they throw at him, Carlos Tevez, their own captain, is still not convinced enough about the project to want to stay.

Those unwanted tags will also leave every player who decides to join Manchester City having to deal with being called mercenaries, even though most of them (I believe) had genuinely joined for footballing reasons.

And it panned out much the same way in the Community Shield. City made some noise at first, with their fans singing and doing that silly hop with their backs facing the pitch (which effectively means they’re all staring at each others’ arses) at half-time because they had gone two goals up.

It didn’t matter that in terms of football they had just been given a lesson in passing and possession, and were genuinely quite fortunate to have scored.

United promptly emerged in the second half to show them some real class, winning with a combination of skill, attacking endeavour and good old fashioned determination, bagging three goals while fielding youngsters like Tom Cleverly, Danny Welbeck, Phil Jones, Chris Smalling and Fabio.

So this season – while Manchester United continue to draw compliments that winning is “in their DNA”, Chelsea retain that aura of impenetrability established by Mourinho, Arsenal rake in the plaudits for their seemingly never-ending pursuit of footballing perfection and equilibrium, and Liverpool hang on to the promise of being a sleeping giant – Manchester City will simply remain in the minds of most as the Noisy Neighbours. Even if they end up winning the title.

Sometimes, you just gotta hand it to Fergie.

Chasing Chelsea

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

On paper, I’d like to say I should have better things to do than spend the better part of a week chasing a bunch of guys who kick balls and wear shorts for a living all over town.

Having just realised how wrong that last line sounded, let me set the record straight (pun truly intended) – I was assigned to cover Chelsea Football Club’s recent tour stop in Kuala Lumpur – their arrival, the press conferences, meet and greets, community projects, training, the friendly game against Malaysia and most importantly, the interviews.

So yeah, since those guys in shorts included Premier League living legends like Frank Lampard, Fernando Torres and Didier Drogba, I didn’t mind so much.

Nothing truly prepares you for the mania that surrounds an English Premier League team coming to Asia. You’d find grown men waiting desperately outside the team hotel just to catch a glimpse of their favourite footballers. I assume these are the same people who complain about K-Pop fans being silly.

Come to think of it, I’ve interviewed Lady Gaga, rock heroes Incubus and MTV World Stage hit Neon Trees in the past two weeks as well, and none of them got anything close to the kind of reception Chelsea got.

Okay, so Gaga had a handful of teenage fans waiting downstairs at the lobby of the Marina Bay Sands. Chelsea turned the lobby of the One World Hotel into a sea of blue.

Well Gaga’s just one person right? Maybe Chelsea got a bigger crowd because they themselves are a bigger crowd? Wrong.

Manchester United sent just ONE player – an ex-player, actually – to KL three weeks ago when Edwin van der Sar came with the Champions Trophy Tour, and I had to literally claw my way through the crowd to get into that interview room; and even there, I was made to sweat for it. Three other colleagues of mine were there, and none of them managed to get an interview.

As for Incubus, after our interview the guys went lounging by the hotel pool, and it seemed nobody recognised them at all! Now tell me Torres or Drogba could have enjoyed that same anonymity.

At all the Chelsea events, there would be a throng of reporters, photographers, videographers and sportscasters from not just around the region, but also from Britain, desperate to get some face time with any of the players. It was mayhem. Everyone was restless.

No offense to the Neon Trees, who were really cool, but there was no such clamouring at their press event.

Arrival

The mayhem began when the team arrived at the One World Hotel in Petaling Jaya, Selangor. A crowd had built up even though it was the middle of a working day (I’d like to think it was because we tweeted it out on twitter.com/thestar_rage – shameless plug), and you could see quite a lot of them, in office wear, clutching Chelsea jerseys.

I was there because there was going to be a press conference with new Chelsea manager Andre Villas-Boas and two players, who turned out to be Frank Lampard and Branislav Ivanovic.

And no, I didn’t get the chance to see if Frank remembers me from our London interview =(
Villas-Boas, now often referred to as AVB, seems like a pretty serious guy. We had another chance to talk to him after the 1-0 victory over Malaysia (it was NOT a goal, by the way. I was sitting right along the goal line), and his tone was more or less the same – very business-like.

One thing I noticed about him is that he never gives a straight answer. It’s never yes or no. It’s always a convoluted answer with lots of disclaimers and many layers of logic which prevent him from being caught out by the media.

When asked about Torres’ form, he answered by questioning the media’s “obsession” with Torres not scoring, and then moved on to talk about the importance of the “collective”, the competitiveness within his squad, and the objectives of pre-season training. It would’ve been easier to just say “no, I’m not worried about it”; but that’s not AVB’s style, I guess.

But he did show a “soft side”, so to speak, when talking about pre-season training camps.

“You can do in Asia, in Europe, in America or in other countries, but it’s always important to touch the people who loves us, but are far away from us,” he said.

Player interviews

I think the most fun I had that week was asking Ashley Cole about, y’know, his “personal life”.

The England left-back has had a hat-trick of secret lovers reveal themselves after news broke that he was getting back together with ex-wife Cheryl Cole, the ex-X-Factor judge, who also almost became Ashley’s ex-ex-wife, and c’mon – you can’t possibly expect me not to ask about that, right?

So when the time came for the interview, I got all the questions I wanted to ask out of the way – what do you do on tour in your spare time, does the new young manager relate better with you personally, and then bam! I hit him with the big one – how do you handle the speculation surrounding your personal life?

“I don’t talk about that,” he muttered, immediately looking away, while the Chelsea press secretary stepped in to remind us that it was a “Chelsea event” and we should only talk about football.

Well I thought I phrased that question pretty innocuously, but I guess from his point of view, there’s really nothing he could say that wouldn’t be construed negatively. It was a no-win situation.

So instead, I’m left with quotes like these:

“A lot of (the players) just sleep to be honest (during pre-season tours). There are a few people who’re of course on the X-Box, but most people go sleep and relax and chill out.

“We train in the morning, we have lunch, we have a few hours’ sleep, and we train again. So there’s not really much we can do,” he said.

Really, Ashley? Do you really JUST sleep? – see? No win situation.

But to be fair, he seemed a nice enough guy. He was polite, he answered all our other questions patiently, and he took as many photos and signed as many autographs as he could. Luckily I got mine BEFORE the interview.

I had to get my picture with Ashley BEFORE the interview, of course... =P

The other interview I got to be part of was with former Arsenal, Real Madrid and France striker Nicolas Anelka. He was pretty cool too.

I asked if he felt he’s changed from his earlier days as the infamous “Le Sulk”, and he candidly replied: “I’m still the same. Nobody really knows me because I don’t speak a lot in the newspapers.

“But you know, it’s my way. I like to be simple outside of football, and on the pitch. The most important for me is to play football, enjoy on the pitch and I’ve tried to do this since I started and now, like you said, I’m at the end, and I’m pleased with everything I did in my career.”

In the end, I didn’t get the interviews I was hoping for with the big four – Lampard, Drogba, Terry and Torres – but it was a good way to end a crazy fortnight. Up next for me, the Red Hot Chilli Peppers in Hong Kong. Fingers crossed, I get an interview with one of those four. Wish me luck!

Speaking to a Lady

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

A couple weekends ago, I was sent for a Lady Gaga showcase and interview in Singapore.

I’ve been lucky enough to have already met and interviewed her once before, so this time there was sorta less pressure. Plus I remembered how nice she was the first time. She’s really down-to-earth and sweet, and she made us feel really comfortable the last time.

And somehow, Gaga always brings the best out of me. I remember how easy it was writing the first interview, and how easy everything just came out. She’s just such a fascinating personality to write about, and her quotes are always so powerful and emotive.

Anyway, just thought I’d share the article I wrote on that second interview. It was published last Thursday in StarTwo. Hope you guys enjoy reading it as much as I did writing it =)

 

*********************************************

The Lady has arrived

Lady Gaga at her showcase two weeks ago in Singapore

Lady Gaga at her showcase two weeks ago in Singapore

 

The biggest artiste in the world. Those are pretty big shoes to fill – not that big, clunky shoes aren’t Lady Gaga’s thing – but that’s how they introduced Gaga at a press conference in Singapore last week, just hours before she took to the stage at Marina Bay Sands to put on one helluva show.

Okay, so maybe the guy who said that might have been overstating a bit, being one of her record label bosses, but you can’t really argue with him – the Lady is a monster of a performing artiste.

In terms of album sales, Born This Way has sold over five million copies in just over a month, and that’s to go with the 14 million albums she’s already sold in a career that, though it rarely feels that way, is just less than three years old.

And then there’s the cultural impact. There were fans there waiting the entire day outside Marina Bay Sands who knew her bodyguard’s name, how tall she was, which hotel she stayed at during her last tour stop, how often she does yoga and pretty much any kind of ridiculous trivia you can think of to ask.

And these fans aren’t the hysterical star-gazers smitten by their idol’s good looks (obviously). They feel a very real sort of connection with her, they feel like she understands them, that she cares for them.
But that’s what the best performing artistes do – they don’t just communicate, they connect; and at her hour-long showcase that night, boy, did she connect.

If you want to watch a real superstar in action, a performer at the peak of her powers, get yourself tickets to a Gaga gig because she is the sh*t.

Gaga doing her thing on stage

Gaga doing her thing on stage

She’s just one of those artistes that has so much creativity, so much talent that it just seems to ooze out, from her every move, her every note, her every pore.

During her concert in Singapore, she did a lot of her new material – Born This Way opened, Edge Of Glory was electrifying and Judas was the encore; plus a couple of “old” tracks too, Just Dance and Bad Romance.

Not that I had to pay for it, but I would pay just to watch her usual party piece where she gets on the piano. That, for me, is when she’s in her element. She went from an almost heart-wrenching rendition of Hair, to an a**-kicking, smoking-hot belting of You And I where she really let her vocals soar. Take away the crazy hair, the weird shoes and ridiculous outfits, and this lady can still rock it out with the best.

Gaga on the piano

Gaga on the piano

The concert did, however, come with an eerie reminder of another artiste who had filled similarly big shoes – Michael Jackson, whose songs they were playing before the show started.

In many ways, Gaga and MJ are the same – uncompromising live performers who leave everything out there on the stage, preachers of a message of love, and artistes who had an impact way beyond the confines of music. On stage, she is – possibly quite literally (if you believe the tabloids) – like Michael Jackson on crack; a post-modern, counterculture version of the King of Pop.

At the press conference was another ominous reminder. It was held at an exhibition in Marina Bay Sands’ ArtScience Museum on Vincent van Gogh, the talented but tortured painter. Well I’m not saying Gaga is gonna chop off her ear and shoot herself in the chest, but it was hard not to draw comparisons between the three exquisitely gifted artistes.

WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL?: Gaga at the press conference.

WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL?: Gaga at the press conference.

Speaking to a Lady

What’s different about Gaga, is that while the other two struggled with being different, Gaga accepts it, and celebrates it.

When I first interviewed her two years ago, she was just starting to hit superstardom, and she said the biggest misconception about her was that Lady Gaga is just a persona. Gaga is who she is, and she won’t be changing for anyone.

“I can’t ditch (the persona). It’s who I am,” she said back then. “I got to where I am by making a conscious decision to give up everything and live a life of music. Some people find it so eccentric, they say ‘she’s a character’, but the truth is, I just really live and breathe music.”

Two years on, she’s a full-blown superstar, the biggest artiste in the world. Somehow, the themes we talked about still felt very much the same – self-acceptance, tolerance, art, and celebrating life.

Does she still feel misunderstood now that her fan base has, like, really exploded?

“No, I don’t,” she said, pausing for a while, as she often did to ponder the perfect answer. “I think the beauty of what I create is that it’s all up to misinterpretation.”

It’s that kind of almost hippie-like self-acceptance she has, of being at peace with the inevitability of being misunderstood, that really makes you feel better about yourself when you’re talking to her.

The word “taboo”, she says, doesn’t exist in her vocabulary. She doesn’t want to be “provocative just for the sake of of being provocative”, but strives to make her art thought-provoking because to her, nothing should be beyond discussing.

Everything about her seems to make sense once you’re in a room with her. You sort of get what was with the crazy outfits, the weird videos, the making-an-entrance-in-an-egg thing.

Her most pervading, underlying message, however, is pretty simple to catch.

“I believe that art and love are the same thing, so as long as we can push the boundaries of art, we can push the boundaries of love and acceptance, and I intend to push quite forward,” she said.

That was the main message of Born This Way, which Gaga said was to push the boundaries “whether it be political, religious or social; or whether it just be for that one 15-year-old in high school who gets bullied and is afraid to go to class.”

With all that talent and success, and that larger-than-life personality, you’d be forgiven for forgetting that Gaga was just a normal girl who had a dream.

Before she was famous, Gaga lived in a small New York apartment, where she would play songs by her favourite artistes, put on her outfits, and dance out on the fire escape.

“I used to dream when I was 12 or 13 years old that some day I would get to wear Gianni Versace. I would look at all of the legends I really worshipped, and I would imagine that I could someday make an impact on the universe the way that they did.

“I had this whole elaborate video planned for Edge Of Glory, but once I got out on that fire escape and danced in that one outfit I realised that it was time to just have a moment of acknowledgment for myself as a 25-year-old who’s been working so hard from the bottom up my whole life,” she said.

But it’s not just a moment to admire her achievements. For Gaga, it’s about doing even more.

“They just told me the other day we’re at five million records worldwide, and it’s been only over a month. Where can I take this record? How far can it go? How much can we push the boundaries?” she said, pausing again to laugh a bit at herself.

While smiling sheepishly at herself, she added: “I just love art so much I talk about it like it’s the centre of the universe. I’m sorry if I sound hyperbolic, but it’s the centre of my universe.”

Group photo! You can't meet Gaga and not ask for a photo, right? =P The others are journalists from around the region.

Group photo! You can't meet Gaga and not ask for a photo, right? =P The others are journalists from around the region.

Villas-Boas SO not like Mourinho

Share It!
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

People in football are often very diplomatic in interviews.

They’re very complimentary, very safe, and they try their best not to step on anybody’s toes with what they say.

I spoke to Edwin van der Sar recently, and he wouldn’t even name the best player he’d ever played with to avoid offending the others!

It was nice of him, but honestly, it’s the ones who aren’t like that that make the best interviews for us journalists – your Mourinhos, Ferdinands, Maradonas, etc. Spoke to John Barnes a couple months ago, and he didn’t mind saying what was wrong with his former club Liverpool at all.

Mourinho’s first press conference as Chelsea manager is already the stuff of legends. “Maybe I am a special one,” he proclaimed with that now trademark upturned nose.

And he was. So why not say it as it is?

Now Andre Villas-Boas, the new Chelsea manager, has been touted as Mourinho’s Mini-Me but at his press conference in Malaysia just a couple hours ago, it became immediately apparent that you won’t be getting any of those outrageous Mourinho-isms with this guy.

It’s not a bad thing. It’ll just be less fun for the press.

Naturally, journalists will sniff for an outrageous quote with some probing questions, trying to get something out of the ordinary. It’s their job.

Some interviewees will be more than glad to oblige, while others prefer to take the sting out of those questions by giving some off-the-mill response.

From what I heard at that press conference, Villas-Boas is definitely in the latter category.

He downright refused to answer a question about Luka Modric, gave the most non-committal, convoluted answer you could imagine when I asked whether he’d be buying British players like Dalglish and Ferguson have, and really didn’t make any of the outrageous statements that were Mourinho’s bread and butter.

Again, it’s not a bad thing. The point is, he’s not like the “Secial One” at all.

Though he owes much of his football education to the Special One, “AVB” – as some fans now refer to him as – seems a completely different manager to Mourinho.

He seems grounded where Mourinho was arrogant, gracious where Mourinho was grating, and sensible where Mourinho would prefer to be outrageous.

He was bright, down-to-earth (he smiled and responded directly to each journalist who asked a question) and yet very confident. Mourinho, on the other hand, was often summed up in just one word – brash.

While Mourinho operated on extremes, AVB seems much more balanced. Perhaps he’ll provide that stability that Chelsea need now after Ancelotti’s ridiculous sacking.

But then again, what do I know? I’ve only seen a bunch of his interviews on TV and attended one press conference. Chelsea fans will just have to wait and see how things go when the season kicks off.