Posts Tagged ‘facebook’

  • Looking back

    0

    By DAVID LIAN
    alltherage@thestar.com.my


    IT IS the end of the year again, and that means another 31.5 million seconds have passed us by. If those seconds were precious moments to treasure, how would you rate your 2012? Good, bad or you can’t remember?

    Thanks to the Internet, our societal memory is improving. Archiving the history of our culture has now reached a level of detail never before thought possible. People are creating more petabytes of information every year, and most of that automatically too!

    With its Zeitgeist, Google has been demonstrating just how its very own search technology can capture what people were interested in year after year. Google Zeitgeist works by taking the millions of searches made by users all around the world throughout the year, and then analysing that data into trends.

    This year, out of 1.2 trillion searches in 146 languages, the top search was “Whitney Houston”, presumably right after the singer’s untimely passing in February, followed by “Gangnam Style” and “Hurricane Sandy” took the third position.

    Locally, the top search was for “SAPS” (Sistem Analisis Peperiksaan Sekolah) – a result that really puzles me. But it was followed by “Gangnam Style” and “9GAG” respectively, restoring some faith that our youth on the Internet are still the fun-loving people I assumed them to be.

    However, Google is not the only “play maker” in town any more. This year, social networking sites – notably, Facebook and Twitter – have also released their own analysis of the top things of 2012.

    Housed on the webpage facebookstories.com is an interesting take on the “Year in Review” concept by Facebook. Rather than analysing search results, Facebook looks at its users’ posts and the most widely shared and viewed content on its network to derive the “top stories” of 2012.

    The top meme on the Facebook list was “To Be Honest” (TBH) while “Gangnam Style” was a disappointing fifth.

    What I really liked about Facebook’s list was its ability to break down everything down to the type of content. Facebook could tell you the top videos shared, the top songs played, and what people were actually talking about throughout 2012.

    Then there’s the personalised look back at the year. Surf over to Facebook Stories and you’ll see a big blue button inviting you to find out what your personal top moments of 2012 were. Click on it and Facebook will analyse your Facebook profile and give you what it thinks are your top 20 moments. Some of the moments are no brainers – like our birthdays for example.

    But I was pleasantly surprised to find a video of my daughter singing (uploaded in January) that made it’s way to this list.

    This function has helped me relive some of the great moments I had almost forgotten about this year.

    Similarly, Twitter has also introduced its own look back at 2012 at 2012.twitter.com. Like Facebook, Twitter collects your tweets throughout the year and lets you know your top 2012 moments
    Twitter partnered with visual company Vizify.com to deliver your moments in an interactive infograph. You can pull a “slider” from the beginning of 2012 to the end to see what your top tweets were and what your friends were talking about.

    Looking back at my own 2012 through the eyes of social media sites like Facebook and Twitter has made me realise just how much I’ve done or experienced this year.

    Precious moments especially the pictures I took of my kids (too few, in my opinion) and the issues I discussed were easily captured and pointed out.

    It’s no wonder that many great men and women kept diaries back in the days not just to simply jot things down, but to remind themselves of the things they had done throughout the year and the lessons they had learnt.

    Thankfully, now we have social networks for that.

  • Back from the dead

    0


    It is hard to imagine that after all these years, the debate on which social network is king is still going on.

    Of course, until earlier this year when they released their IPO, Facebook was the de facto social media du jour. Twitter was a close second naturally but the truth is that it doesn’t have the user base that Facebook has. Google tried to make an entry as well, but really, who is still using Google Plus consistently?

    Still, if there’s one thing that active social media users know is that anything can happen. Look at MySpace and Friendster and how as former kings of social media they have both fallen from grace. I can hear you laughing at the mere mention of those two sites.


    But don’t dismiss them so quickly yet – at least not MySpace. It would appear that those behind it, including one very famous Justin Timberlake, isn’t quite so ready to let it go. And earlier this week, the social network site emerged with yet another rebanding exercise. This time, some people are actually getting excited.

    There are the usual cynics among the critics, but there are also many people around the world now saying they regret ever deleting their accounts. Personally, I’m not too sure of its future (I still have my account) but I will say it looks pretty slick.

    It’s not completely original, however. If you log on to the site, you’ll be welcomed by lots of nice big pictures reminiscent of, you guessed it, Facebook’s cover photo feature, which they introduced not too long ago. It would appear that this is the way to go – at least for now – for most social networks as even Twitter recently launched its new profile page a couple of weeks back which allows you to … yup, post up a huge picture to your page.

    If you’re keeping up with your social networks, however, you will also notice that many of these picture-based revamps came by after Pinterest took the Internet by storm. The storm has calmed a little but there is still great interest. I’ve never been one to believe in a dominant social network to rule them all. While I’m on pretty active on Facebook, my preference is Twitter for its speed and simplicity.

    And if you take the business elements out of it (Facebook’s stock price has not been doing really well anyway) and just focus on user experience, then I’d say that any social network site that is keeping it fresh and relevant has a fighting chance.

    That’s what the new MySpace seems to have going for it with this fourth major revamp. It’s sticking to what it knows best – music, something that grew organically when it first started up. It still has many of its deals with record labels and the truth is they’ve already been pigeonholed as a music network anyway. Having a name like Mr JT doesn’t hurt either (I’m sure you’ve already heard the puns about how he’s made MySpace Sexy/Back).

    But looks and sexiness doesn’t make or break a social network, it’s what users can do with it and whether they want to use it that matters. After all, it can be argued that Facebook isn’t the most visually appealing site out there. If anything, its attempt to be everything for everyone gives it an extremely cluttered look. Google Plus has sleekness going for it but it never really kicked off.

    All this brings us back to the question – who will be the eventual king of social networking? I don’t think there is an answer to this because as we have seen from past experience, these networks come, reign, get dethroned and re-emerge again.

    I’m more excited by the fact that people like those behind the revamp are actually still in it (for the money – eventually). Far from thinking that one or two networks need to reign supreme, I’d rather have these sites co-exist and give each other some competition – friendly or otherwise.

    This is because we have come to see how easily it is to get sucked into one ecosystem and never being able to leave. We often complain about Facebook and Twitter’s decisions and changes yet we can’t quit because we don’t quite have many alternatives.

    I hope that MySpace and other new attempts like App.net does well because it will keep their competitors and themselves on their feet. Only then will the power really return to the users. After all, the Internet is one of the most democratic tools of this generation and it’s about time we got more control of our (virtual) lives.

    Niki has just completed his MA Digital Culture and Society at King’s College London. Connect with him online at www.nikicheong.com and on Twitter via @nikicheong.

  • To predict or not

    0

    IN the past few years, social media “predictions” have been a popular subject to approach, especially towards the end of the year.

    With social media being such a “new” phenomenon, it was easy getting caught up in it. Will next year see Twitter trump Facebook, or will Google come up with something to kill off its blue nemesis (it tried, and failed miserably in 2011)?

    Who can blame the experts, analysts or academics their predictions? After all, isn’t this the era of new media technologies that move so fast there’s always something new to look into?

    Well, not really.

    If anything, 2011 has taught us that it’s not the mediums and the networks we should be focusing on.

    There was the prediction that this was the year of geolocation – you could tag your tweets with data about where you were, while Facebook’s “check-in” was supposedly going to crush Foursquare. Except that it never really took off, so Facebook essentially killed it and Foursquare remains a niche network.

    Some people who saw this coming decided that it would be more accurate to look at it from a business point of view. After all, how many new networks can one deal with? So, while predictions about which social media network will go public entertained us all year, we’re actually still guessing when all of it will happen.

    I suspect that while we obsessed over what was coming next – in an effort to one up each other – we forgot to look at what was already at hand.

    The biggest mistake in 2011 was asking what was coming next when we should have focused on what the current big guns had in store.

    If we just looked at the more mainstream networks, Facebook introduced the social graph and its Timeline, which look set to change the way the Internet functions forever.

    Twitter gave us several new looks – not just via its web version but also with its native apps for the iPhone and BlackBerry.

    Then more recently, we saw the re-emergence of the “anti-social social network” Path, an iPhone app that once allowed you to add only 50 friends (its reincarnation allows 150). The first time it launched, it died a slow death but rose from the ashes over the past few weeks by “borrowing” ideas from successful applications like Facebook (with its own timeline feature) and Instagram’s photo manipulation concept.

    The best part is that it allowed you to connect each update via its application with the most popular existing networks – Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and Foursquare.

    Facebook

    It’s early days still but it looks set to be the next iPhone app du jour. Why? Well, it’s because it acknowledges the power of the aforementioned social networks and attempts to survive by complementing them as opposed to competing with them.

    If my interpretation of what Path is doing is correct, then 2011 would have been the year that the biggest social networks made their mark and withstood any of its competitors – Google+ and Diaspora (what?).

    So where does this leave us as 2012 approaches?

    I wouldn’t dare make any predictions, really. At this stage, I feel like we’ve been obsessing over social media so much that we’ve forgotten the largest digital ecosystem in which it resides.

    Along that vein, I would say that we can look forward to 2012 as the year where digital users empower themselves. We’ve already seen how social media assisted in protests – either in the Arab world or in many Western countries via the Occupy movement – so much so that Time magazine named the “protestors” as its person of the year.

    My vision is that next year, we move forward from there and empower ourselves to be active users of social media by being more conscious of how we engage online, be aware of what we’re “liking” and retweeting and figure out how else we can be more efficient users of social media, than just following the trends.

    I won’t predict that for 2012, but I would definitely hope for it.

    * Niki Cheong is pursuing his Master’s degree in Digital Culture and Society in London. Connect with him via www.nikicheong.com or www.twitter.com/nikicheong.

  • Too young to Facebook?

    2

    In your honest and totally unbiased opinion, what is the right age for someone to be allowed to sign up for a Facebook account?

    Currently, in keeping with the United State’s 1998 Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), Facebook only allows people aged 13 and above to sign up for its service. Yet, a study this year by Consumer Reports found that about 7.5 million children have Facebook accounts.

    What’s with all these kids wanting to get on Facebook anyway?

    Well, if you’re anybody and everybody in school, being online and socially connected is something you strife for. When I was younger, this came in the form of IRC (Internet Relay Chat) although there were less rules back then. All you had to do was learn how to download and install a piece of software.

    Today, the social network du jour is Facebook. And even before Facebook, kids have found a way to make use of blogs and other social networks to express themselves and connect with friends outside of school.

    Without a doubt, COPPA was an immensely important act in its time. In theory, at least, it protects children from unwittingly divulging sensitive, private information to strangers, especially those with malicious intent.

    However, as the latest Consumer Reports study has shown, children are fast getting around this through the means of fake accounts, and very little can be done to stop them. In an attempt to keep up with the times, a bill is being mooted in California to allow parents of kids aged 18 and below the right to request for the removal of information on their child’s social network.

    Explaining why the bill was proposed, California state senator Ellen Corbett explained that social networks today were “encouraging the disclosure of information that was formerly discreet (like location) and to enable the sharing of information even when not sitting in front of the traditional computer (like mobile phones).”

    This senator is, at least, partly clued into what’s happening in the social space today. Location and mobile are certainly game-changing elements. Parents don’t want their precious children checking-in to school on Facebook on their mobiles, especially if they’ve got strangers following them on Facebook.

    But I think the need goes beyond making up laws. Yes, it’s an important building block to give parents legal rights to take action, but to truly protect young people online, education remains the key.

    So, in a roundabout way, we come back to the original question of this article.

    In an age where social media is becoming a part of our everyday lives, so much so that you see young children toting iPhones in school, it’s hard to think that the law will catch up with the practical reality of the situation.

    Rather, it falls on the parents to understand the technology and to teach their children to use it responsibly, in the same way I learned how to be responsible with the telephone. I remember my mum warning me not to give away our home address or even to say my name to a stranger I didn’t recognise in case they called the house phone.

    Similarly, we need to master the Internet and understand the dynamic effect social networking has on our public/private information dichotomy. I think there’s no better way to teach kids then letting them learn from a young age.

    Also, it is not as if there has not been a precedent. Children-friendly and targeted social networks have existed for quite a while, Disney’s Toontown being an excellent example (http://toontown.go.com). However, there’s always this spark in all of us to do what the adults are doing, isn’t there?

    Hence, the curiosity for Facebook.

    So, should Facebook create a “Facebook for Kids” product? Or perhaps create a special class of accounts for minors aged below 13? I think a “supplementary” account for minors would be a great way to address this issue.

    Parents can sign-up for their children and attach the “supplementary” account for their children to theirs. Facebook can then give parents special controls as – for example, information privacy settings come under parents control. This allows parents to approve what others can or cannot see.

    Perhaps even giving parents control as to what times an account can be logged into might be a good idea, so children can log and post on Facebook only during the times their parents specify. And of course, once the child turns 13, they automatically gets full autonomy of their account.

    The point is – social networking is here to stay. And whatever our reservations or issues with the technology, we’re either going to have to learn to deal with them, or falter in our progress.

    q David Lian is a father of one and is looking for ways to keep his daughter out of trouble online, if he’s able to. Tweet him feedback or suggestions at www.twitter.com/davidlian.

  • The next step

    0

    WHEN Sohaib Athar (@Really Virtual) sent tweets out about the “rare event” – a helicopter hovering above Abbottabad, a city in Pakistan – a few nights ago, he didn’t imagine that he would be credited with “breaking” such an important piece of news.

    In fact, it was such an insignificant moment, that the second tweet was in jest: “Go away helicopter – before I take out my giant swatter :-/”.

    The helicopter was one of four in a raid held to capture Al Qaeda’s Osama bin Laden, which eventually led to his death.

    Of course, no one (besides those who were clued in about the raid) knew about the incident Sohaib was tweeting about.

    In fact, the Twitterverse only went on an #osama and #OBL rampage after @KeithUrbahn tweeted: “So I’m told by a reputable person they have killed Osama Bin Laden. Hot damn”. This has been credited by many news sources as the first tweet about the attack.

    OBAMA: Scooped by Twitterverse.

    OBAMA: Scooped by Twitterverse.

    It appeared even before US president Barack Obama officially announced the news.

    Like most major news that has “broken” on Twitter, the frantic search to find the early tweeters is a given. This would be followed by the announcement, often by advocates of social media’s prowess, that Twitter has once again trumped the traditional media.

    Considering the number of breaking news we’ve gotten on Twitter, I wonder if we’re not tired of the same rethoric yet.

    Ever since Janis Krums posted that now-iconic picture of the US Airways plane that crashed into the Hudson River in New York in 2009, Twitter has been credited with breaking the news of several significant events and incidents.

    The picture posted by Janis Krums on Twitter of the US Airways flight that crash landed on the Hudson River.

    The picture posted by Janis Krums on Twitter of the US Airways flight that crash landed on the Hudson River.

    Many – the traditional media included – have acknowledged social media’s speed in terms of information dissemination. It is this realisation that has led to the many debates about the journalism industry, the downfall of traditional media, and social media’s role in this “phenomenon”.

    The fact is that it is not the ability to “scoop” the traditional media that makes social media what it is. Social media does not exist in isolation and is most powerful when used to complement and mobilise action.

    That is why it is time we move on from focusing on the breaking news factor and instead look at other elements that social media can offer. Perhaps, we should start asking more often: “What can social media do after the news has broken?”

    We have already seen examples of this happening in the past few months.

    In Japan recently, when the tragic earthquake happened, social media aided in the search efforts (through Google’s “Person Finder”) and in sending out tsunami alerts. In North Africa, and the Middle East, it was the conversations happening on social media that served as an enabler for the revolutions.

    I also found Sohaib’s tweets (such as when he posted on Twitpic, “life in Abbottabad”, around the time of Obama’s announcement) to be most interesting in the news development of Osama’s death on Monday. Then there were also the use of Google Maps to indicate the location of the raid.

    These examples indicate that it is in action that social media reigns supreme.

    Online media company GigaOm, in an article titled The stages of news in a Twitter and Facebook era, wrote: “Action. This is where Facebook and social media really shine. From tweets about people seeking more information from friends to those seeking to find out if others are meeting at Ground Zero by checking out a live web cam of the site, people now can learn about news and do something.”

    Many social media advocates will tell you that we haven’t seen anything yet when it comes to the real power of these networks. With each new incident and event happening around the world, we are seeing ingenius new ways in which people are using social media. We live in exciting times, where technology is concerned, but for me, it is in the anticipation of what is to come that is keeping me on the edge of my seat.

  • Free news

    0

    IF YOU are a regular reader of the New York Times online, your days of reading its content for free are numbered. » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Choose your words wisely

    0

    IF YOU have ever gotten any advice about using the Internet and social media, chances are you’ve heard this line:

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • How many friends do you have?

    12

    If you have 233 friends on your social network, it would appear that you’re an average Malaysian.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • The age of Facebook

    0

    If there ever was a moment in time when social media went mainstream, last weekend could have been it.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Changing ways

    1

    According to Justin Kistner, who is a ”social evengalist” at Webtrends, a web analytics company, the social media era is set to peak in 2012.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

Page 1 of 212»